Thursday, October 20, 2011

La Liga vs. EPL: Television Rights

   
  
     How does La Liga sell it's television rights?  What are the differences between La Liga's set-up and that of the European Premier League?  There are pros and cons of each, but which one is better?
     In La Liga, each team is on their own to set-up television deals.  This means that the better, or more popular, teams are more likely to reach more lucrative deals for their clubs, while the less successful teams will simply take what they can get.
     In the EPL, the structure is much more equitable.  The television rights are sold collectively, rather than individually.  The total revenue is split into three groups.  The first group has 50% of the revenue, which is split equally amongst each of the twenty EPL clubs.  The second group has 25% of the revenue, and this is split-up based on league rankings.  The team at the bottom earns X amount of money from this 25%; the 19th-place team earns 2X, 18th-place team earns 3X, and so on.  The team who comes in first will receive 20 times more money from this pool than the team that finished in last.  The remaining 25% makes up the third group.  This money is paid as facility fees, which are determined based on the number of TV appearances.
     There are a few key points to think about when analyzing the differences between the two set-ups:  which one is more fair for the clubs, which one better maintains a competitive balance throughout the league, and which one brings in more money for the league as a whole.
     We'll start with the issue of fairness.  It seems only right that if you succeed on the pitch, you should be rewarded for this.  The better teams deserve to get more money than the worse teams.  In this way, La Liga is more fair than EPL.  But keep in mind that EPL does still give an advantage to the teams who do better.  They split up 25% of the revenue based entirely on league rank.  Is the EPL giving enough money to the better teams in the league?  Are the better teams in La Liga receiving too much money for their success?  If the EPL split up the 25% evenly, and the 50% based on rank, would that be more fair than either of these two current set-ups?
     Competitive balance, which is undeniably a good thing for a league, is clearly more likely to be achieved through the EPL's more equitable distribution of the revenue.  Having more teams in the league with similar finances minimizes the chances for one or two teams to monopolize the talent.
     Finally, we need to look at which television rights structure more greatly benefits the league financially.  Looking at the Domestic markets, we see that while the EPL brings in 1,179 million euros from its television deal annually, La Liga brings in only 500 million euros each year.  In addition, more than half of this 500 million goes to just two clubs, Barcelona and Madrid.  La Liga as a whole not only brings in less than half of the EPL, but it makes less from Domestic TV deals than Serie A and Ligue 1.  This evidence shows that La Liga's teams, outside of the top two, are not getting anything close to what they deserve financially from television deals.
     It seems clear that the EPL structure is better for the league as a whole without a doubt.  La Liga benefits Barcelona, Madrid, and maybe a couple of other clubs who have gained popularity and achieved success throughout the years, but the large majority of the league misses out on receiving much more revenue.  The EPL benefits the league as a whole, but if the top teams in the EPL decide they don't like sharing the money that they're bringing in, could this be yet another factor in setting up the much talked about European Super League?  Even if we assume that the EPL set-up is better, which not everyone does, this does not mean that the EPL set-up is the best.  Would changing the percentages of the three groups to decrease the amount of money split equally and increase the amount of rank-based distribution make things more fair while still keeping the desired competitive balance?

5 comments:

  1. I believe that they are still giving too much to the top teams. This is probably because of my American view on sports. In the U.S. the worst teams are given the best draft picks in order to increase the chance that they will be competitive the following season. I think they should have a similar system here or at least have a fair split for tv rights. It would be a little drastic to say that a reverse system (the lowest teams get the most money) would work. However, I think splitting the revenue evenly will create more of a competitive balance. This is extremely idealistic since the top teams have extremely strong bargaining power compared with smaller clubs and would probably not let anything go through.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There was an article on ESPN.com the other day that was very interesting and relevant about the TV deals in La Liga vs. Premier League. While the Liverpool managing director, Ian Ayre, said that he wanted the bigger clubs to receive more money in the TV deals, Roberto Martinez (the manager of Wigan Athletic, another EPL club) was adamant in expressing the negative consequences of having a TV revenue set-up such as La Liga's. He said the problem with La Liga's set-up is: "You end up splitting Spain into two football teams. The league suffers. That is a shame."
    Martinez elaborated more on this point with some interesting quotes that you can read here:
    http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/id/968787/wigan-boss-roberto-martinez-warns-against-liga-style-tv-deal?cc=5739
    Does a team like Liverpool deserve more money than they receive in EPL's current set-up? Or would the EPL lose its competitive balance like Martinez warns it would if they switched to a TV deal more similar to La Liga's?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is amazing what a big percentage of the television revenue that FC Barcelona and Real Madrid receive compared to the rest of the teams in La Liga. I know that the MLB in the United States is similar to La Liga where teams negotiate their own television rights. I wonder how the Yankees and Red Sox would compared to those two teams in terms of what percentage of the overall television revenue they receive compared to the rest of the MLB. It would also be interesting to see how much revenue Manchester United, Liverpool, and Arsenal would receive compared to the rest of the EPL if they could secure their own broadcasting deals

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unfortunately it is extremely hard to find data about the amount of money television deals bring in for MLB teams. For the Yankees, they make a bunch of money off their partial ownership (around 33%) of the YES Network, which broadcasts most of their games. The Yes Network pays $84 million a year for rights to the games, and also sends the Yankees what Forbes reports to be "dividend checks exceeding $100 million" on top of that. The Red Sox also have a deal in place with NESN. However, it is tough to compare because the numbers are not as public in MLB as they are in La Liga.

    ReplyDelete
  5. now.com體育網 7 x 24 提供英超Premier League最新最熱門免費足球即時新聞,包括利物浦、曼城、曼聯、阿仙奴、利物浦、車路士強勢列陣,戰術分析、球星轉會情報全面收錄。http://sports.now.com/home/football/BPL

    ReplyDelete